OUR PLACE – US based company
• PFAS free.
• NoCo™ nonstick technology (Mainly compromising of Alcohol, water and sand).
• So, Over the past 50 years PFAS is debated, studied and legislated against.
• In addition no PTFEs and PFOAs in their NoCo™ nonstick technology.
• Their tech utilises the lotus effect. Moreover, the pattern on the coating (described as ‘micro, dot-like) which is not visible to the naked eyes makes it; the cookware surface non-stick. Userbaser summing up the reviews of the most popular products.
• Overall, they sum up their tech by: ‘you get the durability of a stainless steel, the searing power of a cast iron, and the ease of a nonstick. All in one’.
userbaser / find the right product for u.
Here is compiled reviews data from multiple sources. – extracted from the web that presents the hidden drawbacks of each of their products written by and from users/consumers.
Pans
Titanium Always Pan® Pro
drawbacks Review Overview [Summary Table].
| Issue | Reported Problems |
|---|---|
| Non-stick longevity. | Rapid loss of performance after 2–6 months of use. |
| Cleaning difficulty. | Residue traps in hex pattern, requiring intense scrubbing. |
| Build quality. | Chipping, corrosion, clunky assembly, handle failures. |
| Weight & ergonomics. | Heavy to lift; pan shape inconvenient for certain tasks. |
| Safety claims. | Trace heavy metals found; marketing may overstate safety. |
| Price vs value. | High cost not matched by durability or performance. |
Always Pan® 2.0
drawbacks Review Overview [Summary Table].
| Issue | Reported Problems |
|---|---|
| Non-stick longevity. | Loses effectiveness after a few months— often sticks even to eggs/kitchen staples. |
| Value for price. | Perceived as overpriced compared to other non-stick pans. |
| Build & finish quality. | Paint chipped; handle prone to heating issues, corrosion, or breakage. |
| Heating performance. | Slow to heat, uneven distribution—especially on induction cooktops. |
| Oven usability. | Handheld plastic components prevent oven use. |
| Care requirements. | Requires careful use (no high heat, hand-wash, wooden utensils) to preserve coating. |
| Versatility overstated. | Doesn’t fully replace deeper, stainless or cast iron cookware. |
Cast Iron Always Pan
drawbacks Review Overview [Summary Table].
| Issue | Details |
|---|---|
| Non-stick performance. | Begins sticking within 4–12 months. |
| Handle durability. | Clicking noise, corrosion, or breakage reported. |
| Enamel quality. | Chipping or flaking paint possibly ingested. |
| Induction usability. | Very slow heating on induction stovetops. |
| Design limitations. | No pour spouts; Hot Grip inconsistencies. |
| Cleanup effort. | May require soaking and manual scrubbing. |
Cookware Set
drawbacks Review Overview [Summary Table]
| Issue | Reported Problems |
|---|---|
| Non-stick durability. | Coating fails after ~6 months, leading to frequent sticking. |
| Cleaning difficulty. | Interior pattern traps residue; hand-wash needed extensively. |
| Induction inefficiency. | Very slow heating, especially for small volumes. |
| Customer service & warranty. | Poor refund processes and warranty limitations for early purchasers. |
| Product weight/design. | Pieces are heavy; not ideal for small households or everyday handling. |
| Finish degradation. | Color fades or chips quickly even under light use. |
| Value for cost. | Premium price not matched by durability or performance. |
| Marketing transparency issues. | Environmental and toxicity claims not independently verified. |
Userbaser
Utensils & Storage
Utensils set
Beachwood Spatulas
Bowl Set
Beachwood Spoons
Walnut knife block
A container collection
Griddle / Baking pans
Griddle Pan
Bakeware Trio (3-piece set)
Bakeware set (5-piece)
At Userbaser we try to sum up reviews of products by making their flaws clearer and using a basic table and text to sum up what is up with a product.
Get it from the users, not ads.
Userbaser / Our place
here is userbaser making a summary of these….
